In Re Bolley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
At issue in this proceeding on petition for writ of habeas corpus is whether a trial court may require, as a condition of probation, a criminal defendant to waive the statutory maximum period of probation. We hold that it may not. Accordingly, we issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the trial court to vacate its decision denying petitioner’s application for probation and to grant petitioner a new hearing on his application for probation.
Petitioner Gary Calvin Bolley was charged with various felony counts arising out of alleged sexual activity with his adopted daughters.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. GilchristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. Trevor W.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- LONDON v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.