Legal Opinion

In Re Bolley

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1982No. Crim. 11792PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

At issue in this proceeding on petition for writ of habeas corpus is whether a trial court may require, as a condition of probation, a criminal defendant to waive the statutory maximum period of probation. We hold that it may not. Accordingly, we issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the trial court to vacate its decision denying petitioner’s application for probation and to grant petitioner a new hearing on his application for probation.

Petitioner Gary Calvin Bolley was charged with various felony counts arising out of alleged sexual activity with his adopted daughters.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re AcostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. People v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GilchristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. People v. Trevor W.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. LONDON v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API