Legal Opinion

Bafico v. Southern Pacific Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMMOND, J. (Pro Tempore).

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant upon the pleadings in an action brought for breach of an alleged contract. Plaintiff contends that on June 11, 1962 he was employed as a section worker by defendant and that while so employed he suffered injury in an automobile collision. He alleges that while he was hospitalized for his injuries the defendant, through its agents “promised to pay all damages suffered by plaintiff, including his litigation costs and damages, as a result of this collision if plaintiff would not sue the Southern Pacific…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jallen v. AgreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Ladd v. General Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Oregon Investment Co. v. SchrunkOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Thompson v. Municipal Bond CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Dave's Auto Center, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Burlington Northern Inc. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Reifschneider v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Johnson v. Dave's Auto Center, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API