Legal Opinion

Snyder & Dull v. Critchfield

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1895No. 5998PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the district court of Richardson county. Tried below before Bush, J. cited: 2 Black, Judgments, sec. 857; McElmoyle v. Cohen, 13 Pet. [U. S.], 312; Chew v. Brumagen, 13 Wall. [U. S.], 497; Keeler v. Elston, 22 Neb., 310; 4 Wait, Actions & Defenses, p. 192, and authorities cited; Nicholas v. Farwell, 24 Neb., 180; Eaton v. Hasty, 6 Neb., 427; Spies v. Whitney, 30 O. St., 69; Braddee v. Brownfield, 4 Watts [Pa.], 474; Packer v. Thompson, 25 Neb., 688; Pringle v.…

Read the full summary

Error from the district court of Richardson county. Tried below before Bush, J. cited: 2 Black, Judgments, sec. 857; McElmoyle v. Cohen, 13 Pet. [U. S.], 312; Chew v. Brumagen, 13 Wall. [U. S.], 497; Keeler v. Elston, 22 Neb., 310; 4 Wait, Actions & Defenses, p. 192, and authorities cited; Nicholas v. Farwell, 24 Neb., 180; Eaton v. Hasty, 6 Neb., 427; Spies v. Whitney, 30 O. St., 69; Braddee v. Brownfield, 4 Watts [Pa.], 474; Packer v. Thompson, 25 Neb., 688; Pringle v. Woolworth, 90 N. Y., 502; Specklemeyer v. Dailey, 23 Neb., 101. The power of attorney contained in the note to confess…

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action by the plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error on a judgment alleged to have been recovered in Pennsylvania. The case was tried to the court, which found for the defendant. The only assignment of error-calling for notice is the sufficiency of the evidence. The plaintiffs offered in evidence a transcript from the court of common pleas of Somerset county, Pennsylvania, which discloses the entry of judgment by confession against Critclifield and in favor of Austin Critclifield to the use of Perry Critclifield, to the use of Harrison Snyder and Rufus H.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Luper v. WertsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Eaton v. HastyNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Rising v. BrainardIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Keeler v. ElstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Nicholas v. John V. Farwell & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crim v. CrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  2. Bank of Chadron v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Egley v. T. B. Bennett & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Hastings v. BushongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Shary v. EszlingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API