Legal Opinion

Rising v. Brainard

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1864PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Winnebago county.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This is an application for a supersedeas. The error assigned is, that a judgment was entered in vacation by confession under a power of attorney upon a note, more than a year and a day after the note fell due, without proof that the defendant was then alive, or that the debt was then due. The power of attorney was sufficient in its terms to authorize the entry of the judgment. This court has reversed judgments entered by confession, where the terms of the power of attorney did not authorize the entry of such a judgment; also, j udgments entered in vacation where there was no proof…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Martin v. JuddIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Blake v. State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Packer v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hansen v. SchlesingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Knox v. Winsted Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API