Smith v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice:
We are asked to determine whether the evidence before a trial court in a garnishment proceeding was sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered against the garnishee. The issue which proved decisive in the case is: In a garnishment proceeding against an excess insurer, which party has the burden of proving that the limits of other insurance policies involved have been exhausted?
The factual situation giving rise to the garnishment proceeding is as follows: Mr. Smith, owner of an automobile, loaned the automobile to Mr. Brádley, who subsequently damaged the car when he drove it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Wiley v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Moral Insurance Co. v. StevesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Peerless Boiler & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
3Cited by15 opinions
- Culie v. ArnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Country Mutual Insurance v. FonkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Gay & Taylor, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1981
- Mustain v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hibbs v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.