Legal Opinion
Lanier Ramer v. William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 6, 1975No. 74-1483PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
The contention that the “policies” of the Bureau of Prisons have never been considered “rules” within the contemplation of the Administrative Procedure Act and therefore never should be, and the counterpoint that had they been the resulting broader input into them and more understanding compliance with them would constitute a much needed and salutary reform of the Federal Pris*697on System,1 come along and between the lines of the briefs like Sandburg’s Fog. However, such a confrontation will have to move on to another time or case. The district court, having permitted…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Louis Wolfish v. Honorable Edward LeviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Simmat v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Joel D. Joseph v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Iowa Civil Liberties Union v. CritelliSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.