Legal Opinion

Gee v. Olson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1948No. Docket No. 3, Calendar No. 43,659PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

This is an action in assumpsit in which plaintiff seeks to recover for commissions for procuring orders for defendants for manufacturing war materials, which commissions plaintiff claims he earned but which were not paid him. Defendants filed a cross declaration to recover for claimed overpayment of commissions, which overpayment defendants allege is recoverable under their contract of employment with plaintiff because of renegotiation refunds agreed on by defendants with the United States government.

The trial began before a jury but the jury was waived after a considerable portion of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Milligan v. HaggertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nichols v. SeaksMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnston v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Berk v. Gordon Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
  4. Pat J. Murphy, Inc. v. Drummond Dolomite, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
  5. Nice Ball Bearing Company, Counterdefendant-Appellee v. M. H. Lescure, Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API