Legal Opinion
Dukes v. Cole
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1985No. 3769PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, P.J.
Plaintiffs, Charlie Mae Dukes and Marquise C. Dukes, appeal the judgment of the juvenile court dismissing their complaint in a paternity proceeding. This court reverses that judgment.
On December 9, 1983, the Prosecuting Attorney of Lorain County filed a complaint on behalf of Charlie Mae Dukes and her son, Marquise C. Dukes, to establish that the defendant, Willie Cole, is the father of Marquise. On March 30, 1984, the trial court granted Willie’s motion for the parties to submit to genetic testing. The testing was scheduled for May 1, 1984, at 9:00 a.m. Willie arrived on time. He waited…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Quillie B. Woodham v. The American Cystoscope Company of Pelham, N. Y., and the Xyz CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Robert Connolly v. Papachristid Shipping Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Johnson v. NormanOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Edwards v. SaduskyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Laguta v. SeriekoOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Harden v. Dayton, 22072 (3-28-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Gooslin v. FortadoOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hallock v. HallockOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Heard v. SharpOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.