Heard v. Sharp
Ohio Court of Appeals
1DissentMarkus, J.
I agree with the majority that the trial court properly denied the requested continuance and properly dismissed the plaintiff’s case. However, I believe that the court exceeded its authority by dismissing the case with prejudice.
The record fails to show that the plaintiffs absence was so negligent, irresponsible, contumacious or dilatory as to justify a dismissal with prejudice. Cf. Schreiner v. Karson (1977), 52 Ohio App. 2d 219, 223, 6 O.O. 3d 237, 239, 369 N.E. 2d 800, 803. The court abused its discretion when the record does not show that the failure to appear was willful or in bad faith.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toney v. BerkemerOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Schreiner v. KarsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
- Willis v. Rca Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dukes v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- American Housing Corp. v. RhoadesOhio Court of Appeals · 1981