Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 21, 1986No. 49778PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL R. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was convicted of driving while intoxicated under § 577.010(1), RSMo.1978, after a trial by jury. He appeals pro se, claiming: (1) the trial court erred in admitting into evidence breathalyzer test results, (2) his conviction violated the prohibition of double jeopardy in the U.S. Constitution, (3) he was denied a speedy trial, (4) a mistrial should have been granted due to prosecuto-rial misconduct, and (5) his conviction was based on insufficient evidence. We affirm.
On February 25, 1984, Saint Louis Police Officer James Mulford pulled over…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- State v. PaulMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Peabody Coal Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. PhroperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dillard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. ConzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- City of Kansas City v. JohnneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State ex rel. Newton v. ConklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.