Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Newton v. Conklin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1989No. 15952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Presiding Judge.

This original proceeding in prohibition arises from an action under the Uniform Parentage Act (“UPA”), C.C.S.S.B. 328, Laws 1987, pp. 646-53, effective July 15, 1987, codified as §§ 210.817-.852, RSMo Supp.1987. Before discussing the issues confronting us it is necessary to set forth the relevant details of that action (“the underlying case”).

Plaintiffs in the underlying case are B_ W_B_(“the child”), allegedly bom in 1983, and his mother, T_ A_ B_ The relief sought by the plaintiffs in the underlying case includes an order declaring Denver Wesley Newton, Jr. (“Denver”),…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. William Ranni Associates, Inc. v. HartenbachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. O'Blennis v. AdolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Morasch v. KimberlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. General Electric Co. v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Noranda Aluminum, Inc. v. RainsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ostermueller v. PotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State ex rel. K.R. ex rel. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Lammers v. LammersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Schimmer v. WallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State ex rel. McCulloch v. LaskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API