Sanders v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, J.*
¶1 — Justice Richard Sanders seeks review of the Court of Appeals decision that the State has no duty to defend him or to reimburse him for attorney fees he incurred in defending himself before the Commission on Judicial Conduct. At issue is whether the State is required to defend a judge who is alleged to have committed an ethics violation while otherwise within the purview of his or her official duties.
¶2 We affirm the Court of Appeals, holding the State has no duty to defend when a judge knows or should know that *168the conduct of which he or she is accused is unethical and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Brashear Electric, Inc. v. Norcal Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021