Legal Opinion
Gersten v. American Transit Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kristin Booth Glen, J.
Petitioner Mendel Gersten (Gersten) petitions, pursuant to CPLR 7510, to confirm a master arbitrator’s no-fault arbitration award. Respondent American Transit Insurance Company (American Transit or the insurer) opposes confirmation of the award but has not cross-petitioned to vacate or modify the award. The petition raises a question of apparent first impression concerning the effect of commencement and abandonment of a de nova judicial review by an insurer on the underlying arbitration award. To determine this issue, however, it is first necessary to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sortino v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- In re the Arbitration between Petrofsky & Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Scinta v. KazmierczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Scarpelli v. MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carpenter v. ElwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RabinerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Abadinsky v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Allstate Insurance v. NalbandianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Brown v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.