Legal Opinion

People v. One MacHine Known As" Circus Days"

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1960No. Gen. 11,327PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wright

delivered tbe opinion of the court.

This action was brought to obtain an order for the destruction of certain coin-in-the-slot mechanical devices on the grounds that they were gambling devices per se. The three petitions which were filed were consolidated by stipulation, approved by the presiding judge. The court heard the consolidated causes and upon a finding that these mechanical devices were not gambling devices per se entered judgment denying the petitions. This is an appeal from that judgment.

Six mechanical devices were seized by Herbert M. Lowry, Administrative Assistant to the State’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bobel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Frost v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  4. People v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. CattaneoIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fraternal Order of Eagles Sheridan Aerie No. 186, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. ForwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 37 GAMBLING DEVICES (CHEYENNE ELKS) v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. WassickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Vaughan v. DowlingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  5. State v. Pinball MacHinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API