Legal Opinion

United States v. Barrow

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1964No. Crim. 20997PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.

There were originally in this case a total of fifteen defendants. All were indicted for conspiracy (Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 371) to violate 18 U.S.C.A. § 1952. 1 Nine of the defendants were indicted for the violation of § 1952; five were indicted for wilfully causing and aiding and abetting the unlawful interstate travel (18 U.S.C.A. § 2); one, Comito, was indicted only for conspiracy.

Comito was severed, and the case went to trial against the other fourteen defendants. The trial judge acquitted Gatto at the end of the government’s case. The jury acquitted…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Robert Edwards, Max Jakob, John J. Lombardozzi and Milton ParnessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. George Barrow, Benny Bonanno, Fred Dipatrizio, Joseph Mattia and Pasquale PilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. William Gene EatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. LawsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API