Legal Opinion
United States v. William Gene Eaton
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1973No. 73-1138 to 73-1140PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARNES, Circuit Judge:
This is a combined appeal by three individuals, two convicted of armed bank robbery (Anderson and Eaton—18 U.S. C. § 2113(a) and (d)); and one of being an accessory after the fact (Fletcher—18 U.S.C. § 3) by aiding or preventing apprehension of the other two appellants.
The facts need not be reported in detail, as no point is made of the insufficiency of the evidence, except as to appellant Fletcher. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the government, as we must on this appeal, the evidence is clearly sufficient to convict two defendants, provided the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. George Barrow, Benny Bonanno, Fred Dipatrizio, Joseph Mattia and Pasquale PilloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Grover Spurgeon King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Michael J. Gleeson, United States of America v. William A. Gleeson, United States of America v. Buck GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Samuel Douglass Harris and Melba Jean GlassCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Carless Jones and Eugene HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. HeathCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Phillip A. ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.