Legal Opinion

Van Denburgh v. Tungsten Reef Mines Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1937No. Civ. 11123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

Emma Beatrice Clark, now deceased, was the widow of A. J. Clark, who prior to his death in November, 1927, owned one-third of the stock of the defendant corporation, which had been theretofore organized for the purpose of acquiring, owning and operating certain mining, properties in Cochise County, Arizona. After the death of A. J. Clark and during the period from November, 1927, to and including June, 1934, the mining property of the corporation was inactive so far as production of minerals was concerned, and one George Krieg, the secretary of the company, was acting manager of the mining…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Betts v. Southern California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Santa Cruz Railroad v. SprecklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. First Nat'l Fin. Corp. v. Five-O Drilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ideal Foods, Inc. v. Action Leasing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Leroy v. Bella Vista Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Dominga G. Soto v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API