Legal Opinion

City of Dardanelle v. City of Russellville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 2008No. 07-195PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

The instant appeal arises out of a longstanding dispute between Appellant City of Dardanelle and Appellees City of Russellville and City Corporation. Dardanelle filed a breach-of-contract action in the Pope County Circuit Court asserting that a joint resolution reached by the cities in May 2002 was a binding contract, which Russellville had breached. The circuit court dismissed the complaint pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (2007), based on the reasoning that the joint resolution was not a contract. Dardanelle now appeals the circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Showmethemoney Check Cashers, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. AlterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Branscumb v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Townsend v. Standard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SmelserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Jorja Trading, Inc.; Automatic Auto Finance, Inc.; Cashfish Motor Pawn, Inc.; Virginia Rivers; Monte Johnston; And John Does 1–10 v. Leah Willis and Adrian BartholomewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  3. Joe Smith v. David H. Arrington Oil & GasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Anderson's Taekwondo v. LandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Bancorpsouth Bank v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API