Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Willis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1897No. 7231PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the district court of Gage county. Tried below before Bush, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

The defendant in error, Willis, by written indenture, bearing date of January 25, 1892, leased to Merrill, the plaintiff in error, lot 7, in block 6, Casebeer’s Addition (to the city of Blue Springs, for the term of one year at the agreed rate at $7 per month, payable monthly in advance, Merrill went into possession under said lease and occupied the demised premises for the period of two months, at the expiration of which time he abandoned the same without Willis' consent. In an action on the lease for the balance of the rent reserved, upon the expiration of the term, Willis recovered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underhill v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Rice v. DudleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Schuisler & Donnell v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  4. Respini v. PortaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Clendinning v. LindnerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gruman v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Higgins v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  3. Goldman v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Bernstein v. SeglinNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Brown v. CairnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API