Legal Opinion

Hirschman v. Saxon

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1966No. Civ. 29951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Cross-complainant Hirschman appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of respondent Saxon on appellant’s cross-complaint alleging medical malpractice. The sole question presented by this appeal is whether or not appellant’s declaration in opposition to respondent’s motion for summary judgment set up facts sufficient to present a triable issue as to the applicability of Code of Civil Procedure, section 340, subdivision 3, which establishes the one-year period within which actions of this type must be instituted. The declaration of respondent filed in support of his motion sets forth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Garlock v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. McCauley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Weir v. SnowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Kulshrestha v. First Union Commercial Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Unjian v. BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Dodge v. FreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API