Legal Opinion

Mayer Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, No. 85PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is an appeal in an unemployment compensation case where the only question is whether the claimant voluntarily retired and went on pension or whether he *506was compelled to do so by bis employer, the Bethlehem Steel Company, Johnstown, Pennsylvania. The bureau refused compensation. The referee allowed compensation. The board reversed the referee and denied compensation. The claimant appealed.

The board found as facts that “3. Sometime in the first half of 1959, pursuant to the annual survey, the claimant was again asked if he was going to retire. He advised management that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Davis Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Campbell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaman Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Homer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Kuster Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Pozniak Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Urban Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API