Legal Opinion

Kaman Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, No. 89PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is another appeal in an unemployment compensation case where the only question is whether the claimant voluntarily retired and went on pension or whether he was compelled to do so by his employer, the Bethlehem Steel Company, Johnstown, Pennsylvania. What we have already said in the case of Mayer Unemployment Compensation Case, 192 Pa. Superior Ct. 504, 161 A. 2d 660, we need not repeat here.

In his brief the appellant says: “The action taken by me to retire, in order to avoid being under constant pressure to retire, does not constitute my voluntary retirement.” The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paoloco v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Sable Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Martino Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Pozniak Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Wolfe Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API