In re Grade Crossing Commissioners
New York Supreme Court
Motion for confirmation of commissioners’ report and to fix the amount of damages, costs and expenses to be allowed the landowner and the petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtLaughdin, J.
The motion for the confirmation of the commissioners’ report is not opposed and is granted.
The landowner presents an affidavit stating the history' of- this proceeding, showing among other things that it was commenced in January, 1895, and was heard before the commissioners in April and May of that year, and- that on such hearing a question of law arose as to whether or not the landowner was entitled to an award for the damages to the remainder of his land not taken, in con*231sequence of the obstructions and structures to be placed and erected in the street in making the improvement which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Grade Crossing CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brainerd v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1911
- City of Los Angeles v. VickersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Sully Chick v. Grade Crossing Commissioners of City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Pecksport Connecting Railway Co. v. WestNew York Supreme Court · 1897