Legal Opinion

Castro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 1994No. 207 C.D. 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

Claimant Carmen Castro petitions for review of the December 20, 1993 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the Referee’s decision to grant Employer Albert Einstein Medical Center’s petition to modify or suspend Claimant’s workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm.

The narrow issued raised- before us is whether a referee may first modify a claimant’s benefits based on the wage of a job referral which claimant fails to pursue and then later suspend benefits based on the higher wage of a later job referral.

The following facts are undisputed. On…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Lukens, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Cerebral Palsy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Cardone v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. United Cerebral Palsey & Motorist Mutual Insurance Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. United Cerebral Palsey & Motorist Mutual Insurance Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API