Legal Opinion · Dissent

United Cerebral Palsey & Motorist Mutual Insurance Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1994Published

1DissentSmith, Judge

I dissent from the Majority’s decision to reverse the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board’s order because it relied upon this Court’s decision in Associated Plumbing & Heating v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Hartzog), 126 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 618, 560 A.2d 865 (1989), in calculating Claimant’s modified benefits.

In Associated Plumbing, this Court held that an employer is only entitled to a modification of benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §§ 1-1031, based on the wage rate of the first job referral which a claimant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Krawchuk v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Associated Plumbing & Heating & CNA Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Miller v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API