Legal Opinion

Lisso & Bro. v. Giddens

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 4, 1906No. 15,839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Eleventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Red River; Charles Yernon Porter, Judge. Action by Lisso & Bro. against Tandy K. Giddens, J. J. O’Bierne, and others, warrantors. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

Plaintiff’s action was petitory.

Plaintiff, as owner, claimed under a tax title, while defendant claimed under a recorded deed of purchase of anterior date.

Plaintiff’s contention is that the property was regularly sold to the state in 1895 for the unpaid taxes of 1894, and that it was a second time sold to the state in 1897 for the unpaid taxes of 1896.

It was sold by the state to the plaintiff in satisfaction of the unpaid taxes of 1896, and no mention was made of the prior sale of 1895 in this deed by the state to the plaintiff.

The defendant, on the other hand, owns under a deed of sale by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Boagni v. Pacific Imp. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Doullut v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  4. Pitre v. SchleslingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pill v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. In re VeithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. Byrne v. Commercial Security Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Fraser v. WeckerlingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. State Ex Rel. Board of School Directors v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API