In re Veith
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Proceeding by Philip Veith, praying for possession against Hyman Hiller & Co., Limited. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.
The seven squares of ground hereinafter described were adjudicat*1109¡ed to the state in 1885, for taxes of 1883, due 'by J. B. Patrick. Philip Veith bought same from the state in 1909. In 1910 he instituted the present suit, which is a proceeding under 'section 5 of Act No. 80 of 1888, providing for the putting in possession of purchasers of property at tax sale. He does not allege that any one else is in possession, but simply asks that the sheriff put him in possession, “unless enjoined.”
The sheriff served upon Hyman Hiller & Co. a notice in which occurs the following:
“By virtue of a writ of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Booksh v. A. Wilbert Sons Lumber & Shingle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- In re Quaker Realty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Pitre v. SchleslingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Gauthreaux v. TheriotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Quaker Realty Co. v. LabasseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Quaker Realty Co. v. PurcellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
- Leader Realty Co. v. Lakeview Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Board of Directors of Public Schools v. New Orleans Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Ebert v. WoodvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.