Legal Opinion
Brister v. All Star Chevrolet, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided August 27, 1997No. CIV. A. 96-3447-B-MIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
BERRIGAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on summary judgment motions filed by defendants Aegis Auto Finance, Inc. (“Aegis”), All Star Chevrolet, Inc. (“All Star”), and Chase Manhattan Bank U.S.A, N.A. (“Chase”). 1 Having considered the record, the parties’ arguments and the applicable law, the Court grants Aegis and Chase’s motions, grants in part All Star’s motion, and denies in part All Star’s motion.
Background
Plaintiffs Floyd Brister, Lena Brister, and Miriam Smith (“plaintiffs”) have brought claims against All Star arising from their automobile purchases…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Edmonston v. A-Second Mortgage Co. of Slidell, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Gibson v. Bob Watson Chevrolet-Geo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Russell v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Russell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jacqueline Turner, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Beneficial Corporation, Beneficial National Bank, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Taylor v. Quality Hyundai, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- PHRASAVANG v. Deutsche BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Vallies v. Sky BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Baldwin v. Laurel Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.