Legal Opinion

Diffendal v. Kash and Karry Service Corp.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1988No. 749, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSALYN B. BELL, Judge.

Appellants, Anna Diffendal and Joseph Diffendal, filed a complaint against appellee, Kash and Karry Service Corporation, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. In Count I, Anna Diffendal sought damages arising from a personal injury which she sustained while shopping in Kash and Karry’s supermarket. In Count II, the Diffendals sought damages arising from their loss of consortium resulting from the injuries suffered by Anna Diffendal as set out in Count I. Kash and Karry denied liability and alleged that the Diffendals’ cause of action was barred by the doctrine of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. M. E. DibbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Metropolitan Mortgage Fund, Inc. v. BasilikoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KuhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Shoppers Food Warehouse MD Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Lone v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Zilichikhis v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Imbraguglio v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Campbell v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API