Legal Opinion
Glynn Dale Sistrunk v. Gregory Lamar Haddox
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided March 31, 2021No. 5:18-cv-00516Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION GLYNN DALE SISTRUNK, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-516 VERSUS JUDGE ELIZABETH E. FOOTE GREGORY LAMAR HADDOX, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY MEMORANDUM RULING Now before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendant Gregory Haddox (“Haddox”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. [Record Document 176]. The motion has been fully briefed. [Record Documents 176–77, 183–84, & 189–90]. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion for Summary Judgment [Record Document 176] is GRANTED IN PART and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.