Legal Opinion
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 2, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0678PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge
Plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corporation, best known as Amtrak (“Plaintiff’ or “Amtrak”), brings this action to vacate an arbitration award under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (“RLA”), and the Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 3 § 1 et seq. (“IG Act”). After a labor dispute between Amtrak and Defendant the Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189 (“Defendant” or “the FOP”) involving one of the FOP’s members, on March 24, 2014, an Arbitrator issued a Decision and Award in favor of the FOP.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189 Labor CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189 Labor CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. v. WheelerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020