Legal Opinion

Gelinas v. Fugere

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 20, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a petition in equity in the nature of quo warranto, brought under the provisions of general laws 1923, chapter 379.

The petitioner, Francois Gelinas of Woonsocket, is making claim to the office of commissioner of public works of that city, and requests the court to confirm his right to that position. The respondent Alphonse Fugere, the present acting commissioner of public works, contends that he is rightly and lawfully the holder of that office, and contests the right of the petitioner thereto.

From the record it appears that the act creating the office of commissioner of public works…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. State ex rel. Olson v. LahiffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Warmoth v. GrahamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
  4. Cytacki v. BusckoMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re GovernorshipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sawyer v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Brown v. CurbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crook v. Township of ClarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. Scrivens v. Elizabeth Lund HomeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API