Legal Opinion
Smith v. Doe
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 10, 1985No. 70499PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
This is an action for benefits under the uninsured motorist provisions of a motor vehicle insurance policy. Plaintiffs were injured when the vehicle in which they were traveling crashed following evasive maneuvers to avoid a collision with another vehicle driven by an unknown individual. Plaintiffs appeal following a verdict and judgment in their favor contending, among other enumerations, that the verdict is grossly inadequate and contrary to law and the evidence as to each plaintiff. Held:
1. “[I]t has long been the rule that when a verdict has been returned in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maloy v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Smith v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Wages v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Karlan v. EnloeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWESTWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- J. B. Hunt Transport, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Mansfield v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Williams v. OpriciuCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Palmer v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.