Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2017No. 17-1054UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Harris L Hartz, Circuit Judge

Harold Cunningham, proceeding pro se, appeals the judgment approving the settlement of a class action brought by mentally ill prisoners housed in the federal administrative-maximum facility in Florence, Colorado (ADX). He argues that the settlement was not fair, reasonable, or adequate because it did not provide for money damages. He has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. We grant IFP and affirm.

I. Background

We provide a brief description of the background to frame the issues presented for review. In 2012 counsel for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Fymbo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Rutter & Wilbanks Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bacote, Jr. v. FBPCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Bacote Jr v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
  3. Speer (ID 96901) v. BeardsleyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API