Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Lathrop

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to District Court of Clear Lalce County.

1Opinion of the Court

Stallcup, C.

This writ of error is prosecuted to reverse the order of the district court denying the application of the plaintiff in error, Charles H. Curtis, to be permitted to intervene in the cause of Rhoba Lathrop v. Charles W. Pollard, which application was made after remand of that cause upon the first appeal to this court. The relation of the said Curtis to the said cause is shown by the statement and opinion just filed in this court upon the second appeal thereof. There was nothing alleged in the petition of the plaintiff in error showing that his rights or remedies could be affected…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Limberg v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henry v. Travelers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Ousley v. CurpheySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. People v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Westcott v. PattonColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Westcott v. PattonColorado Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API