Legal Opinion
Compañia Sud Americana de Vapores, S.A. v. I.T.O. Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 18, 1996No. Civil Action No. S-95-1838PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SMALKIN, District Judge.
The parties to this indemnity action in admiralty are plaintiff Compañía Sud Americana De Vapores, S.A., (CSAV), and defendants I.T.O. Corporation of Baltimore (I.T.O.), Coastwide Cargo Securing Co., Inc., (Coastwide) and Atlantic Marine Contractors, Inc. (Atlantic Marine). The action is before the Court on the cross-motions of CSAV and I.T.O. for summary judgment. CSAV seeks summary judgment against I.T.O., or, “[i]n the alternative,” against I.T.O. and Coastwide jointly and severally. *858(CSAV’s Mot.Summ.J. at 3). I.T.O. seeks summary…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint of Kreta Shipping, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Shofstahl v. BD. OF COM'RS OF ORLEANS LEVEELouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Van Ommeren Bulk Shipping B v. v. Cooper/T.Smith Stevedoring Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Shofstahl v. Board of CommissionersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003