Legal Opinion

Shofstahl v. Board of Commissioners

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 2003No. 2002-CA-0018PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I,MICHAEL E. KIRBY, Judge.

Plaintiffs ran their boat into an unlit pier at night. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal this judgment. We find that the defendants by maintaining the pier in the condition they did were a cause in fact of the accident. Nevertheless, the plaintiffs were the sole proximate and superseding cause of their maritime accident. Therefore, summary judgment was properly granted by the trial court because proximate causation cuts off liability for a cause in fact under general maritime law.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

On the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Sinitiere v. LavergneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shofstahl v. BD. OF COM'RS OF ORLEANS LEVEELouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API