Legal Opinion

Conservatorship of Rich

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1996No. A072467PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

In this conservatorship proceeding, the conservatee, Doris M. Rich, filed a notice of appeal from an order of the superior court denying her motion for substitution of attorneys. Respondent, James A. Moore, conservator of Mrs. Rich’s estate, moves to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the order is nonappealable.

Proceedings in the Trial Court

Respondent Moore is the conservator of the person and estate of the 91-year-old Mrs. Rich. Since July 1994, Robert K. Bolt has served as her attorney.

In October 1995 Mrs. Rich filed a motion to substitute Attorney Craig A. Brandt in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Meehan v. HoppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Marriage of SkelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Otay River Constructors v. San Diego ExpresswayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Muller v. Fresno Community Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Strasbourger Pearson Tulcin Wolff Inc. v. Wiz Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Safaie v. Jacuzzi Whirlpool Bath, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. MacHado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API