Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Anderson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1985No. 84AP-08 through -15PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStillman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court finding former R.C. 4509.101 unconstitutional.

Former R.C. 4509.101 required the court in a traffic case to determine whether the defendant had met the requirements of the Financial Responsibility Act as established by Am. Sub. S.B. No. 250. If the court found there was no compliance, it was required under R.C. 4509.101(B)(1) to impose certain sanctions, including a ninety-day license suspension, impoundment of registration and plates, and notice by the court to the Registrar of Motor Vehicles concerning the court’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Columbus v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kearns v. SherrillOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kearns v. Sherrill, City Mgr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. City of Dayton v. StrausbaughCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tripodi Family Trust v. Muskingum Watershed, 2007 Ap 09 0056 (12-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API