Ace Bag & Burlap Co. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED LETTER OPINION
POLITAN, District Judge.
ORIGINAL ON FILE WITH CLERK OF THE COURT
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Sea-Land Service, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and plaintiff Ace Bag & Burlap Co., Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter was decided without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons stated herein, defendant Sea-Land Service, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Furthermore, plaintiff Ace Bag & Burlap Co., Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and its’ Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
STAT…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Allied Chemical International Corp. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd BrasileiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brocsonic Co., Ltd. v. M/V" MATHILDE MAERSK"District Court, S.D. New York · 2000