Legal Opinion

Ace Bag & Burlap Co. v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1999No. Civ.A. 96-6119(NHP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED LETTER OPINION

POLITAN, District Judge.

ORIGINAL ON FILE WITH CLERK OF THE COURT

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Sea-Land Service, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and plaintiff Ace Bag & Burlap Co., Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter was decided without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons stated herein, defendant Sea-Land Service, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Furthermore, plaintiff Ace Bag & Burlap Co., Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and its’ Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

STAT…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Constable v. National Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Allied Chemical International Corp. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd BrasileiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brocsonic Co., Ltd. v. M/V" MATHILDE MAERSK"District Court, S.D. New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API