Legal Opinion
Brocsonic Co., Ltd. v. M/V" MATHILDE MAERSK"
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 6, 2000No. 98 Civ. 7546(LBS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
This action by Brocsonic Company, Ltd. (“Brocsonic”) relates to a transoceanic shipment of electronic goods from Kobe, Japan to Santos, Brazil. Defendants Maersk, Inc., Dampskibsselskabet af 1912, Aktieselskab, and Aktieselskabet Dampsk-ibsselskabet Svendborg (collectively “Maersk”) had previously moved this Court to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but we denied that motion without prejudice to renewal so that the parties could conduct further discovery as to certain jurisdictional facts. Such discovery having been recently completed,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brocsonic Co. v. M/V "Mathilde Maersk"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Cooper Marine & Timberlands Corporation v. Bellmari Trading USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018