Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Harding

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-5432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

I have before me a very unusual civil rights action brought by plaintiffs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985(3). Defendants Ray M. Harding and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons) have each filed motions to dismiss which the court must now resolve.

I. Facts 1

Plaintiffs’ complaint arises out of a dispute between Plaintiff Margaret W. Fuller and her first husband, Warner P. Wood-worth, over the temporary custody of their fourteen (14) year old son, Marc. Plaintiffs are Margaret W. Fuller, Marc’s mother, and Anne Woodworth and David W.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Logan v. LillieDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Behr v. SniderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Pyle v. HatleyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. Appeal of Fuller (Margaret W.), Woodworth (Anne, David W.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Kansas Ass'n of Public Employees v. Kansas, Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API