Legal Opinion
Pyle v. Hatley
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 10, 2002No. CV 02-5741-WJR(RC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FIRST REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint along with the attached First Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.
IT IS ORDERED that:(1) the First Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted;(2) the complaint is dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction against defendants Arlene Schreiber, Robert Schreiber, Stanley J. Steiber, Dr. Jerry Howie, Judge David Gamble,…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reliance National Insurance v. Dana Transport, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- McCleary v. NelmarkDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024
- Vashisht-Rota v. Utah Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023