Herriman v. Layman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Henry District Court. — Hon. W. S. With-row, Judge. Action for breach of promise; the defendant appeals from judgment against him.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.
In March, 1898, the defendant employed the plaintiff as a domestic in his household, and she continued as such until November 20th following. According to her testimony, she had become engaged to marry the defendant in May or June, and, because of her love for him and expectation of a home¿ had yielded to his embraces. She had accompanied him on several occasions, as on the 4th of July, to the county fair, and possibly to town, and subsequently to her departure he had repeatedly taken her out riding. He denied having been engaged to or uhdul'y intimate with her, and explained that she simply…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holloway v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Geiger v. PayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Denslow v. Van HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Rime v. RaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Vierling v. BinderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Beans v. DennySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Fletcher v. KetchamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Frank v. BerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Nolan v. GlynnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.