Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Dirigo Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 27, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.
These arc two actions of assumpsit on two policies of fire insurance issued severally by the defendants. The cases are reported to this court upon the following agreed facts: — ■
Each of the defendants insured the plaintiff under the Maine Standard Policy issued August 22, 1917, for three years against fire, the Narragansett $1,000, on neat stock not to exceed $75 on each; the Dirigo $1,100, on neat stock not to exceed $75 on each, $100 on vehicles, and $800 on horses not to exceed $200 on each.
At the time of the insurance the premises were occupied by the assured and her husband and continued…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matthews v. . American Central Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Herrman v. . Adriatic Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance v. McGuireMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Cumberland Valley Mutual Protection Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Johnson v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- Tomasetti v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Unobskey v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
- Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. v. WaughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.