Legal Opinion

Savard v. Marine Contracting, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 16, 1969No. Civ. No. 12158PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On September 23, 1966, decedent, an employee of defendant Marine Contracting, Inc. (Marine) was engaged in diving operations on the barge “Choctaw” for defendant Perini Corporation (Perini). The barge was anchored in the navigable waters of the United States in Narragansett Bay, within the territorial waters of the State of Rhode Island. During the course of a dive, decedent was killed.

This action was commenced by decedent’s widow (as administratrix and as an individual) and children, seeking recovery under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688 et seq., the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elaine Jones v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Canal Barge Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Mpiliris v. Hellenic Lines, LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  4. Johnson v. American Aviation Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1974
  5. Hartley v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API