Legal Opinion
Hartley v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1982No. 80 CV 3008, 81 CV 1497PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
NEAHER, District Judge.
These consolidated actions seek recovery for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff James Hartley (“Hartley”) during the course of his employment with defendant Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. (“Kiewit”). In the first action, No. 80-3008, Hartley and his wife assert claims under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, 1 against Kiewit for Hartley’s bodily injury, loss of earnings and medical expenses. Jurisdiction for the second action, No. 81-1497, is also asserted under the Jones Act, but the claim is of an entirely different nature. In the latter action, Hartley alleges that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bernard Harney v. William M. Moore Building Corporation and Lopier Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Lawrence Whittington v. Sewer Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Freida Gust Savard v. Marine Contracting Inc. And Perini CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Brien v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992