Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Gantz

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 11, 1953No. Civ. A. 1693-51PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

The plaintiff, who received injuries during the course of his employment by defendant Able Contractors, Inc., was treated ■by the physician defendants, Gantz and Gray, for such injuries, pursuant to their employment by defendant American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, the insurance carrier of a workmen’s compensation policy for the employer. In this suit plaintiff alleges in count one that the defendants neglected and failed to provide adequate and proper medical care and attention to him, resulting in his permanent injury and deformity and much physical pain and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruth v. Witherspoon-Englar Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Sarber v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  3. Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Ellamar Mining Co. v. PossusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flood v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Ray v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Schulz v. Standard Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1954
  4. Griffin v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Flamm v. Bethlehem Steel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API