Legal Opinion

Auto Parts v. Employment Relations Division Uninsured Employers' Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00-456PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Appellant Auto Parts of Bozeman (Auto Parts) carried workers’ compensation insurance with Montana State Fund (State Fund). State Fund canceled Auto Parts’ coverage for failure to pay a premium. Thereafter, the Uninsured Employers’ Fund (UEF), assessed a penalty against Auto Parts for failure to carry workers’ compensation insurance. Following a contested hearing, the Workers’ Compensation Court found that the Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) erred by not allowing Auto Parts to defend the UEF claim on the basis that State Fund had improperly canceled its policy. The court found that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federated Mutual Insurance v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Haines Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Holtman v. 4-G's Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Raymond W. George TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. City of Billings v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Total Mechanical Heating & Air Conditioning v. EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS DIVISIONMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. DittonMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Lester Ammondson v. Northwestern CoMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ammondson v. Northwestern Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Bush Hog, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API