Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1987No. 935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

After a trial by jury appellant, James Davis, was convicted of first degree murder, two counts of criminal attempt to commit murder, two counts of aggravated assault and various weapons offenses arising out of a multiple shooting in which one victim was killed and two victims were shot and severely wounded.

The salient question, inter alia, for our disposition is: whether police violate an accused’s constitutional rights as set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), when after thoroughly informing the accused of these rights, they ask…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BazemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Baine v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API